CHURCHES may be divided into four 
    descriptions, in regard of their prevailing character.
    (J. A. James, "The Church in 
    Earnest" 1847)
    The first consists of those in which an apparent 
    high degree of spirituality exists; the preacher is devout, and his 
    sermons partake of his own habitude of thought and feeling; the people, like 
    the pastor, are thought to be, and perhaps are, professors of a higher tone 
    of piety than many others; and there is much of the divine life. But 
    although numerous and wealthy, they do nothing, or nothing in proportion to 
    their ability, for the cause of Christ. Their collections are few and 
    small—they are not at all known as engaged in any of the great societies of 
    the day. They seem to suppose their calling to be to luxuriate on gospel 
    privileges, to enjoy a perpetual feast of fat things; but they appear to 
    think they have no vocation to proclaim the word of the Lord; or at any rate 
    they consider themselves as something like the Jewish church, a stationary 
    witness for God.
    The second description of our churches is that of 
    the communities of Christians where there is perhaps less of spirituality, 
    less of the desire for doctrinal theology, either in the pastor or the 
    flock, though their spiritual life is by no means low in comparison with 
    many others; but with them all is activity and energy, the pastor is devoted 
    not merely to his people but to the cause of God at large. The collections 
    are numerous and great. The church can be depended upon, and is looked to 
    for assistance by the directors of our evangelistic institutions. All hands 
    are busy in Sunday and daily schools, tract distribution, Bible classes, and 
    organizations for home and foreign societies; all that know them think and 
    speak of them as a thoroughly working church.
    The third description applies to those who are 
    neither the one nor the other of the foregoing; they have lost their 
    spirituality and have not gained a character for activity; they neither 
    enjoy the life of godliness nor diffuse it, they have not even a name to 
    live—but are dead.
    The fourth description includes those, (alas! how 
    few they are,) who unite earnest spirituality with activity and liberality 
    no less eminent; whose spiritual life is all healthfulness and vigor, and in 
    whom its developments are seen in all the operations of holy zeal.
    This then is what we want—churches in which the vital 
    principle of piety shall be so strong that they may be said to be like the 
    mystic wheels of Ezekiel, instinct with the Spirit of God and ever in 
    motion; churches whose activity, like that of the strong and healthy man, is 
    the working of a life too vivacious to remain in a state of indolence and 
    repose; churches so filled with the Spirit, that his gracious influence is 
    perpetually welling up and flowing over in streams of benevolent activity 
    for the salvation of the world; churches partaking of so much of the mind of 
    Christ that from their own internal constraint, they must, like him, be ever 
    going about doing good. Oh that God would pour out his Spirit, and raise 
    every separate fellowship of believers to this blessed state of spiritual 
    prosperity!